Current:Home > Stocks'It is war': Elon Musk's X sues ad industry group over 'boycott' of Twitter replacement -CapitalWay
'It is war': Elon Musk's X sues ad industry group over 'boycott' of Twitter replacement
View
Date:2025-04-15 00:28:19
Elon Musk’s social media company X, formerly known as Twitter, has filed a lawsuit against a group of advertisers, accusing them of violating antitrust laws while boycotting the platform.
Filed on Tuesday in the United States District Court for the District of Northern Texas, the lawsuit alleges that the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), “conspired” to “collectively withhold billions in advertising revenue” from the company. Among those brands specifically cited in the lawsuit are CVS, Unilever, Mars, and Danish renewable energy company Orsted.
GARM is an initiative under the World Federation of Advertisers, that works to works to help brands avoid advertising alongside illegal or harmful content.
The boycotts, which included dozens of companies along with those specifically named in the lawsuit, stemmed from concerns that what was then known as Twitter did not properly adhere to GARM’s content safety standards.
The lawsuit alleges, however, that these boycotts were a violation of antitrust laws, calling them a “coercive exercise of market power by advertisers acting to collectively promote their own economic interests through commercial restraints at the expense of social media platforms and their users.”
X executives respond
Linda Yaccarino, the chief executive officer of X, penned an open letter on Tuesday, alleging that the boycotts had cost the company billions of dollars in revenue.
“To put it simply, people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is undermined and some viewpoints are not funded over others as part of an illegal boycott,” Yaccarino wrote.
Musk was somewhat blunter in his own Tuesday statement, saying on X, “We tried peace for 2 years, now it is war.”
According to the lawsuit, the boycotts began in November 2022, shortly after Musk acquired the company, and were due to concerns that Musk’s pledges to loosen content restrictions would leave the platform no longer compliant with GARM’s standards.
While lawsuit alleges that the company has subsequently applied brand safety standards that are comparable to those of GARM, the boycotts have continued.
A longstanding contentious relationship
The social media giant has had a contentious relationship with advertisers over content moderation since Musk acquired the company in 2022.
When speaking at the New York Times DealBook summit last November, shortly after several major companies including Apple, IBM and Walt Disney had pulled ads from X after Musk called an antisemitic post on the platform “the actual truth,” Musk lashed out, calling the advertising boycott “blackmail” and repeatedly telling those advertisers to “(expletive) yourself.”
In July 2023, X Corp. filed a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a non-profit that published reports on hate speech on the platform, alleging that they were damaging to the business interests of the company.
That lawsuit was dismissed by a judge in March.
X Corp. also sued media watchdog group Media Matters in November, 2023, claiming that the group’s report showing advertisements appearing next to posts on X that praised Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party were misleading and defaming. That lawsuit is set to head to trial in April, 2025.
Max Hauptman is a Trending Reporter for USA TODAY. He can be reached at MHauptman@gannett.com
veryGood! (32)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Why Paul Wesley Gives a Hard Pass to a Vampire Diaries Reboot
- In a stunning move, PGA Tour agrees to merge with its Saudi-backed rival, LIV Golf
- The Plastics Industry Searches for a ‘Circular’ Way to Cut Plastic Waste and Make More Plastics
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- How two big Wall Street banks are rethinking the office for a post-pandemic future
- Untangling All the Controversy Surrounding Colleen Ballinger
- Germany’s New Government Had Big Plans on Climate, Then Russia Invaded Ukraine. What Happens Now?
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Sky-high egg prices are finally coming back down to earth
Ranking
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
- Western Forests, Snowpack and Wildfires Appear Trapped in a Vicious Climate Cycle
- Dive Into These Photos From Jon Hamm’s Honeymoon With Wife Anna Osceola
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- UBS finishes takeover of Credit Suisse in deal meant to stem global financial turmoil
- Miami-Dade Police Director 'Freddy' Ramirez shot himself following a domestic dispute, police say
- The migrant match game
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Nature vs. nurture - what twin studies mean for economics
A year after Yellowstone floods, fishing guides have to learn 'a whole new river'
A landmark appeals court ruling clears way for Purdue Pharma-Sackler bankruptcy deal
Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
YouTubers Shane Dawson and Ryland Adams Expecting Twins Via Surrogate
r/boxes, r/Reddit, r/AIregs
Peter Thomas Roth Flash Deal: Get $133 Worth of Skincare for Just $43